Building Code Rules & Installation Specifications for Guardrail Cables: Wire Rope Railings
CABLE RAILINGS & GUARDRAILS - CONTENTS: What's a cable or wire rope railing? What's the difference between a guardrail and a handrail? Specifications for Installing Cable-Type Guard Railings along Balconies or Stairways. Cable Railing Specifications: railing height, cable diameters, cable spacing, cable support & cable tensioning. Maximum Sphere Passage Rule vs. Cable Type Guardrails & Stair Rails - Importance of Proper Cable Railing Spacing, Tension & Cable Railing Rigidity. The Ladder Effect of Horizontal Cable Railings - climbing children & Safety Issues
POST a QUESTION or READ FAQs about Building Code Rules & Installation Specifications for Guardrail Cables: Wire Rope Railings, spacing, tensioning, support, cable diameters, inspection, safety hazards, applications, & code approvals
InspectAPedia tolerates no conflicts of interest. We have no relationship with advertisers, products, or services discussed at this website.
Guide to cable railings or wire rope guardrails:
This article describes and includes illustrations of cable or wire rope railings or guardrails used along decks, balconies, walkways and stairways. We include definitions of guardrail, a handrailing or stairway handrail, and other terms that assist in understanding the building code, construction, and safety requirements that wire cable type railings must meet.
We describe the key installation features necessary for cable railings and we explain both the 4-inch sphere rule problem faced by cable railings and the ladder-effect or climbability problem that these systems must also address. Installing a cable railing according to the manufacturer's specifications for spacing, tension, support, and other parameters (described here) improve the safety of cable railings.
Where the presence of children argues against any sort of horizontally-run guard railing member, cable railing manufacturers can provide vertical cable railing designs.
Building Code & Manufacturer Specifications for Cable (Wire Rope) Used in Stair & Guardrail Installations
What's a Railing? What's the difference between a guardrail and a handrail?
While cable "railings" are permitted under some building codes and by local building Inspectors we find that people speak a bit loosely about the definition of
"railing" - and "cable railing".
It is important to be clear in our terminology as building codes specify different requirements for handrailings than for guardrailings in terms of construction, height, and graspability. 
Definition of Guard railings
Properly, questions about cable railings or wire rope rails are asking about a guard rail, a type of safety "fencing" or "railing" used along the outer side of balconies
and stairways, not a "hand railing". Below in this article we discuss the installation and safety of cable-type guardrailings.
Our photo at left illustrates a home-made (and unsafe) cable guardrailing around the top of a stairwell opening in a New York home inspected by the author. The cables were visibly slack, incomplete, and the entire assembly so wobbly that it would easily collapse if leaned-on or stumbled-against.
A handrail is a horizontal or sloping rail intended to be grasped by a person's hand for support when using a stairway and
importantly, instinctively grasped in an attempt to arrest a fall.
Our photo (left) illustrates use of a wire cable "hand railing" along steps ascending the Pyramid of the Sun outside Mexico City.
Watch out: A wire rope or wire cable in the typical dimensions used at railings (1/8-inch to 3/8-inch in diameter) is not a graspable handrailing by any of the building code standards because of its small diameter.
1003.3.3.11.3 Handrail grasp ability. Handrails with a circular cross section shall have an outside diameter of at least 1.25 inches (32 mm) and not greater than 2 inches (51 mm) or shall provide equivalent grasp ability. If the handrail is not circular, it shall have a perimeter dimension of at least 4 inches (102 mm) and not greater than 6.25 inches (159 mm) with a maximum cross-section dimension of 2.25 inches (57 mm). Edges shall have a minimum radius of 0.125 inch (3.2 mm). - 2000 BOCA, ICBO, SBCCI
See HANDRAILS & HANDRAILINGS for details about hand railing building codes, construction, inspection, & safety concerns.
Specifications for Installing Cable-Type Guard Railings along Balconies or Stairways
If you take a look at cable "railing" specifications provided by a company that sells components
for cable railing construction [such as Atlantis Rail, Keuka Studios, or Wagner Companies, three suppliers of cable railing systems, you'll see that the "railing" is really a guardrail comprised of
stainless steel horizontal cables of diameters of 1/8", 5/32", 3/16", and 1/4" depending on the application.
Horizontal cables are
stretched tight, 3" o.c. to form a barrier and are supported by a combination of structural posts and intermediate posts spaced 42" o.c.
to 48" o.c. depending on the manufacturer's recommendations.
At left a wire guardrail installed at a private residence in Tivoli, NY uses individual cable tensioning devices at each end of a three-sided cable railing. Each of these little cable guardrail tensioners is secured to the wooden post with three wood screws. I'm uncertain just how much rail tension can be achieved without pulling the tensioning device right off of the post to which it was attached.
Wire Rope or Cable Guardrail / Railing Height - Balconies & Walkways vs Stairs
The International Residential Code (IRC) requires a minimum 36-inch-high guardrail for all decks, balconies, or screened enclosures more than 30 inches off the ground. 
The guardrail top height is in most jurisdictions 36" high (or more) in residential applications and 42" high in commercial installations. Along a stairway the railing height is governed by different rules because of the need to grasp the railing during use of the stairs.
Handrails are required on all stairs more than four risers in height. Handrails cannot be less than 30 inches nor more than 42 inches above the nosing of the treads
Maximum Sphere Passage Rule vs. Cable Type Guardrails & Stair Rails - Importance of Proper Cable Railing Spacing, Tension & Cable Railing Rigidity
For child safety, the balusters or other decorative infill must be spaced less than 4 inches apart (a 4-inch-diameter ball should not pass between the balusters). 
At above left is an unsafe guardrailing in New York City. In comparison, the guardrailing shown at above right happens to be on a Seattle ferry and resists even active jumping climbing children. The mesh guardrail infill is small enough that little toes and shoes don't easily climb the rail.
Companies selling cable guardrailings point out that building codes (IBC and IRC) specify that the opening between vertical balusters or between
horizontal railings (if the local code official will permit them) must be close enough together that a 4-inch sphere won't pass
between them. 
Watch out: For horizontal guardrailing in-fill cables we point out that if the cable can be stretched or is not properly tensioned, the guardrail system may
fail this 4-inch sphere test.
Also the largest opening between the bottom-most horizontal cable or guardrail member and an individual stair tread
should not pass a 6-inch sphere.
Cable or Wire Rope Spacing & Tension Are Critical for Safe Guardrails
Our photo at above left shows an attractive railing with horizontal cables intended to permit a nice view of the Brooklyn NY skyline. We also demonstrate how easily the cables can be separated as well as how attractive this guard railing is to children.
To have a chance of meeting the 4" sphere rule (maximum sphere passage <= 4 3/8") the cables must be installed with adequate tension and rigidity to prevent deflection by
climbing or playing children or other forces that might be anticipated.
If the cable spacing is more than 3" o.c.) or the cable horizontal span is too great, if the intermediate posts spaced too
far apart (more than 42" of horizontal distance o.c.), or if the cables are not adequately tensioned, the system may fail this
safety test. Using a heavier gauge cable (3/16" diameter instead of the minimum 1/8" diameter) can also add
The supporting structural posts and intermediate bracing also need to be strong enough to handle the forces created by properly
tensioned horizontal cables. Wagner points out that
An incredible amount of tension is generated on an end post when you have ten or more lines, each tensioned at 400 lbs. over a height of 36" to 42". Often designers and fabricators inexperienced in cable railings will not recognize the amount of the tension applied to the posts.
The end result all too often is end posts which will bend considerably as the cables are being tensioned…or with a railing where the cables cannot be properly tensioned without an unacceptable amount of post deflection. The posts to which hardware is mounted must be constructed so that they will not deflect perceptively as the cables are tensioned.
And where we have seen
cable "guardrailings" installed, indeed a graspable and solid top rail was always provided. The top rail also provides a rigid
horizontal support that prevents the whole system from collapsing as vertical posts would bend inwards as the horizontal
cables are tightened.
Also, regular inspection of the tension and security of the cables is something I'd recommend, particularly in public
areas where the system may be subjected to climbers and pushers.
At left we illustrate that these horizontal cables were very resistant to opening, and considerable force was required to cause enough deflection to pass a 4-inch sphere. Notice that a heavier gauge cable diameter was used (3/8"), adding to the cable rail's rigidity.
But below we illustrate another (residential) cable or wire guardrailing system that was easily deflected and opened and whose tensioners appear to be of limited ability.
Atlantis points out that using a cable tensioner such as their RailEasy™ device permits on-site cable cutting to proper length and
adjustment to proper tension without risking slack sagging cables due to mis-cuts or mis-measurement. The company also
describes the proper order of tightening the tension on the horizontal cables, starting at the center cable and then
alternating above and below that point as each cable is tensioned. 
Just below I illustrate how easily some cable guardrail wires can be deflected with a bit of foot or hand pressure. My opinion is that even tightening these cables to a specified tension cannot predict how wide an opening might occur when children climb on the cables unless the tension specification also includes factors for both vertical post spacing intervals and the total length of wires or unsupported wires that are used in the cable guardrail. The cable tensioners illustrated earlier in this article were part of this deflected, cable guardrail.
Other tensioning troubles occur: seeking very high tension in an effort to prevent spreading of the cables by children who may then might pass through the guardrail can bend posts or dislodge them unless the posts are of sufficient strength.
The Ladder Effect of Horizontal Cable Railings - Safety Issues
Our concern with any horizontally-run guardrail structure is that it is climbable, and also that often we find the cables are loose
enough that a child can easily slip between the cables - an installation or maintenance error, not a conceptual error.
In our cable guardrail at above left the tension on the guardrail cables was pretty high but a child standing on the cable can often increase the opening size to more than 4-inches. For researchers who argue that the "ladder effect" is not a useful construct and that children are not attracted to climbable structures, take another look at this photograph.
At above right where in the distance is a nice view of Seattle's Lake Washington, the horizontal guardrailing members are constructed of metal pipe and do not stretch or deflect, but they are more than 4" apart and as they are horizontal, a child could easily climb the guardrailing at this Seattle.
and opening of horizontal guard cables can be minimized by placing intermittent posts at suitable intervals between the supporting
posts. Atlantis suggests no horizontal space between posts should be 4 feet on center - a spacing that I usually see has been
violated by the installer.
Above left we can see by casual observation (sagging and wide-open wire cables) that this cable type stair guard does not protect children using the stairs. This installation is in a coffee shop in Colonia Sur in Queretaro, Mexico. At above right is a closely-spaced, highly-tensioned guard rail and stair guard at the FDR estate in Hyde Park, New York.
At least some of the cable railing suppliers offer vertical cable railings for installations where a horizontal railing is not
approved or not suitable.
In our OPINION, a vertical cable guardrail adequately addresses the climbability question (the ladder effect)
and if properly tensioned, might pass the opening spacing requirements.
The Atlantis company's opinion is that because of their small diameter and lack of rigidity, horizontal cables are thin and not easy to climb.  Indeed in our photo where kids were tugging on the horizontal cables installed in a cable railing in New York City, the cables appeared rigid enough that there was not much visible deflection.
Our field experience is that children enjoy climbing horizontal cables and other horizontally run guardrailings. Perhaps due
to playground practice, it's apparent that kids have little difficulty ascending the cables. OPINION: We do not recommend any type of horizontal guardrail intermediate members that can be climbed in locations where children may be present.
Stairway handrail & stair balusters & guard details are in this sketch.
Balusters (vertical posts comprising the barrier in guards and railings)
Baluster opening between vertical members (maximum sphere passage <= 4 3/8")
Baluster opening in triangular area below guard bottom rail and stair tread (maximum sphere passage <= 6")
Hand-railing heights are given:
U.S. handrails for stairs with one side against a wall: 30-38"
U.S. handrails at open stairs: 34-38" above the stairs
Canadian stair handrails: 32-36" above the stairs
Wall clearance: Handrails along a wall must have at least 1.5" of clearance between the inside surface of the rail and the wall surface.
Railings should not project into the required width of the stairway by more than 4.5" at or below the handrail height above the stairs.
Research on Child Safety vs Cable Guardrails or Stair Railings
Reader Question: are there really safety or security issues for children with cable railings on decks and stairs?
15 August 2015 Barbara said:
Are there any data or feedback on security issues for children with cable railing (deck and staircase)? I am concerned that they might want to climb on the horizontal cables, but not sure if it is a serious issue.
Horizontal cables or any horizontal member in a guardrail are a child hazard as children can and are tempted to climb such a guardrail - a hazard often described as the ladder effect.
The ladder effect hazard at guardrails and stair guards remains a common opinion among safety experts (cited below) and some code officials and home inspectors, regardless of whether or not the railing was approved by local code officials. In our opinion, the aesthetic desire for cable railings and the marketing objectives of vendors may be a factor in the removal of the ladder effect hazard from some building code restrictions on guardrail design and there may be both inadequate fall and injury reporting data as well as conflicting interests between safety and and industry vendors.
For example, Hedge (2007) completed a under the auspices of the National Association
of Home Builders' Research Center (NAHBRC) and funded by and prepared for the National Ornamental and Miscellaneous Metals
Association (NOMMA), an industrial association that includes vendors of cable railing systems that did not find data which supported the need for additional
Readers concerned only with code violation and "legality" of cable guardrailings should check with their local building code enforcement official. Readers concerned with child safety should also review the safety articles cited below. Istre (2003) makes clear that guardrail openings spaced or capable of being spaced more than 4 inches apart are a significant fall and injury hazard for children.
Typically there are other hazards such as the ability of the cables to be stretched or moves such that the 4-inch safety opening size can be increased so that a child could also pass through the guard. For this reason some builders and code enforcement officials specify a 3 1/4" spacing between horizontal cables rather than the 4-inch rule of thumb used for solid balusters. Other sources we found (Ellis 2011) suggest that cable manufacturers suggest a 3-inch spacing.
Allowable Openings Code Citations pertinent to Cable Railings
IRC 2000 a 4" sphere - general; 6" sphere cannot pass through the at triangle formed by riser, tread and bottom rail. Required guards shall not be constructed with horizontal rails or other ornamental pattern that results in a ladder effect.
IRC 2001 a 4" sphere - general; 6" sphere - at triangle formed by riser, tread and bottom rail. The Ladder Effect restriction cited in the 2000 IRC was removed.
IRC 2003 R312.2 Guard opening limitations. Required guards on open sides of stairways, raised floor areas, balconies and porches shall have intermediate rails or ornamental closures which do not allow passage of a sphere 4 inches (102mm) or more in diameter.
Exceptions to the spacing rules given above:
Triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom rail of a guard at the open side of a stairway should be such that a sphere 6 inches (152 mm) cannot pass through.
Openings for required guards on the sides of stair treads shall not allow a sphere 4 3/8 inches (107mm) to pass through.
IBC 2000 4" sphere – general - to a height of 34"; 6" sphere - at triangle formed by riser, tread and bottom rail; 8" sphere from a height of 34" to 42".
Exceptions: 21" sphere for elevated walk for electrical, mechanical and plumbing systems and Group I-3, F, H, or S occupancies, balusters, horizontal intermediate rails or other construction.
IBC 2003 3. In areas which are not open to the public within occupancies in Group I-3, F, H or S, balusters, horizontal intermediate rails or other construction shall not permit a sphere with a diameter of 21 inches (533 mm) to pass through any opening.
In assembly seating areas, guards at the end of aisles where they terminate at a fascia of boxes, balconies and galleries shall have balusters or ornamental patterns such that a 4-inch-diameter (102 mm) sphere cannot pass through any opening up to a height of 26 inches (660 mm). From a height of 26 inches (660 mm) to 42 inches (1067mm) above the adjacent walking surfaces, a sphere 8 inches (203 mm) in diameter shall not pass.
Note: the deck building citations below are generally quiet or have little to say about child hazards, climbability, and building code compliance for cable railing systems but they do offer good construction practices and discuss cable tension, spacing, post security and strength and similar cable railing design considerations.
Ashby, Karen, and Maria Corbo. "Child fall injuries: an overview." Hazard Edition 44 (2000).
Culvenor, John F. "Design of Childproof Barriers to Prevent Falls from a Height in Public Places." The Proceeding of the XVI Annual International Occupational Ergonomics and Safety Conference ʹ2002 www.iea.cc/ECEE/pdfs/DesignofChildPrfBarriers_Culvenor.pdf - Excerpt "Figure 10 shows a cable barrier along the edge of a balcony. These types of barriers are hazardous
because they are climbable. In addition, because the cables are flexible, the spacing can be pushed out
to a greater size allowing a child can squeeze through. The cables also present an entanglement and
choking hazard and because of their small diameter are also much sharper than larger diameter bars. "
Ellis, Mark, "Installing Cable Railings,
A simple approach to a great upgrade", Professional Deck Builder, November 2011, retrieved 25 Aug 2015, original source: http://www.deckmagazine.com/Images/Installing%20Cable%20Railings_tcm122-1385984.pdf - Excerpt: The International Residential Code (IRC) says that a 4-inch sphere cannot pass between the cables; most manufacturers recommend placing the cables every 3 inches - rather than every 4 inches - to ensure that a railing meets that requirement, because no matter how tight the cable is, there will always be some play in the center of the run, and over time the cables will stretch, allowing even more sag. [Note: the IRC cited is referring to solid, non-deflectable vertical balusters installed in stair, deck, ramp or balcony guardrailings - Ed.]
Research studies of injuries to children are medically oriented and seldom explore any guard design issues. These studies extrapolate from smaller, longitudinal data sets, usually within a hospital or particular location, to give a national estimate of injuries. Such estimates typically are much larger than the percentage of injuries recorded in the latest injury data set.
Studies of the climbability of different fencing designs have used inconsistent terminology to describe the designs tested, have used adult encouragement of children to climb the fences, and also have provided abundant safety padding to protect against a fall. Such contrived situations do not reflect how behavior might occur in a naturalistic setting.
Recent fall injury data from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission on accidents with guards is analyzed. The results indicate that climbing and falls from these assemblies among young children aged 18 months to 4 years account for an estimated 0.032 percent of injuries resulting in emergency room visits in that population.
[NOTE: the following comment by peer reviewer Kimberly Stone: "Additionally, the 0.032% injury rate for falls from guards stated in the abstract has no meaning initially because it is not reported in a “per population per year” format nor is it placed into context by comparing to other statistics, such as homicides or motor vehicle collision data."
Results from either the research studies or the injury data are neither specific enough nor consistent enough to constitute a solid basis for building code requirements.
Children’s safety concerning guards cannot be guaranteed solely by guard design, but must also involve a program of education on when it is appropriate and when it is not appropriate to engage in climbing a structure.
[NOTE: the following comments about cable guardrails and child safety were provided by peer reviewer Kimberly Stone who commented on the article cited just above:
"It was stressed that the literature reports fall incidences in localized areas and that these rates are considerably higher than that derived from the NEISS data. Reasons for this are not fully discussed. One possibility is that the research is carried out in areas with high incidences of this, which is certainly true considering that most research is carried out in urban areas with high buildings. I would argue that the NEISS may underestimate the true burden of falls from guards for several reasons. One reason which was stated, is that the coding of the NEISS is not conducive to identifying these falls. Also, since little research has been done on the target area of falling from a guard, the fall rates reported in the literature (mostly stairs and windows), does not reflect the actual incidence of falls from guards. Also, many injuries resulting from falls from guards may be treated in urgent care centers, primary care providers’ offices or not brought to medical attention for a variety of reasons. Even though these falls may be less severe since the victims are not seen in an emergency room or hospital, they may still contribute substantially to the economic burden of injury in medical costs and lost income 10.
The conclusions regarding a lack of data regarding guard design features is certainly appropriate. Emphasis is appropriately placed on the fact that there is no research regarding “guards” as defined in this report. However, attention should be paid to the fact that the age of the child seems to be an important factor, since most falls occur in ages 1 to 4, and the fact that after the age of four it seems that few fencing designs can prevent climbing. Examining the fencing designs deemed “unclimbable” by younger children should certainly provide a starting point for guard design.
One concern I have is that emphasis is placed on the child climbing over the guard and falling. There was no mention of the possibility of a child attempting to climb a guard and falling while failing to climb it. In the studies conducted regarding climbability of guards, great attention was paid to preventing children from falling during the study and they did not report if falls occurred when children failed to climb the guard. It is certainly possible that falling backward from the guard could cause as much injury as falling over the guard, and this should be considered when designing guards.
The American Academy of Pediatrics’ policy statement on prevention of falls is appropriately cited when discussing the importance of injury prevention11. There is also an impressive amount of literature in the health education literature regarding health promotion and education, as well as the interaction between legislation and individual and community education. I encourage you to read articles by Andrea Gielen, ScD on this topic. Another report of interest is the report “Built Environment, Healthy Communities, Healthy Homes, Healthy People” which reports on a symposium sponsored by the NIEHS. While it is true that counseling can increase some injury prevention behaviors, the most effective injury prevention strategies are those that involve legislation and passive protection 12" - Kimberly E. Stone, MD, MPH,
Fellow, American Academy of Pediatrics Member, Section on Injury and Poison Prevention, email@example.com.
Istre, Gregory R., Mary A. McCoy, Martha Stowe, Kevin Davies, D. Zane, R. J. Anderson, and R. Wiebe. "Childhood injuries due to falls from apartment balconies and windows." Injury Prevention 9, no. 4 (2003): 349-352. Excerpt: Ninety eight children were injured in falls from buildings during the three year period; 39 (40%) were admitted to hospital. Seventy five of the falls (77%) involved apartments, and most occurred around noon or evening meal times. Among apartment falls, 39 (52%) fell from windows, 34 (45%) from balconies, and two (3%) from unknown sites. For more than two thirds of balcony related falls, the child fell from between the balcony rails, all of which were spaced more than 4 inches (10 cm) apart. On-site measurement showed the rails were an average of 7.5 inches (19 cm) apart; all of these apartments were built before 1984. For more than two thirds of window related falls, the window was situated within 2 feet (61 cm) of the floor.
Katwijk, Kim, & Linda Katwijk, "Installing Cable Railings -
Two specialty tools and a few techniques expand your design options", Professional Deck Builder, March-April 2007, Excerpt: Cable railing is much easier to install than many deck builders think. Horizontal cables are run through holes drilled in railing posts and tightened with turnbuckles or studs (connectors that grab the cable and tighten by way of a nut) until they "sing." Open and airy, cable railing virtually disappears, offering the client an unobstructed view and a clean, contemporary look. Stainless steel cable railing is low maintenance, long lasting, and fairly easy to install. With a little know-how, you can turn a nice profit. Cable and Posts Cable comes in 1/8-inch to 1/2-inch diameters, in 1/16-inch increments.
Lanigan, John Bartlett. "The Most Complete Incomplete Fall Presentation." In ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exposition. American Society of Safety Engineers, 2003.
Lanigan, John Bartlett, and Ruby Clemens. "The When, Where And How to Look For Fall Exposure." In ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exhibition. American Society of Safety Engineers, 2009.
Lido Designs, Inc., "Building Codes - general information and guidelines", [in BuyRailings, a division of Lido Designs, Inc.], (2011), retrieved 25 Aug 2015, original source: https://www.buyrailings.com/t-GeneralBuildingCodes.aspx, Excerpt:
The published 2000 IRC stated that guardrails shall not be constructed with horizontal members or other ornamental pattern that results in a ladder effect. The ladder effect has never been a part of the IBC. The ladder effect was removed from the IRC during the 2001 code cycle. The change was noted in the 2001 IRC supplement and the current 2003 IRC contains no reference to the ladder effect.
However, some local code authorities are using older codes based on BOCA – the creator of the ladder effect wording – and the 2000 IRC. Many local code inspectors are not aware of the 2001 change and may reject guardrailings with infills they interpret as creating a ladder effect. It is taking time for the 2001 IRC supplement and the new 2006 model codes to trickle down to the local levels. In the meantime, be prepared to address this issue should it come up in your area.
National Ornamental & Miscellaneous Metals Association (NOMMA),
805 South Glynn St., Ste. 127 #311,
Fayetteville, GA 30214 Tel:
firstname.lastname@example.org "The National Ornamental & Miscellaneous Metals Association was formed in 1958 to serve the ornamental and miscellaneous metals industry. ... NOMMA is strongly committed to improving the industry through education and advocacy work. We are also dedicated to educating owners and the design/build community on the many advantages or ornamental and miscellaneous metalwork. ... Our Mission Statement: The National Ornamental & Miscellaneous Metals Association serves its members and advances the industry through education and the promotion of a positive business environment. Our Purpose: To promote the common business interest of those engaged in the ornamental and miscellaneous metals industry."
Peden, M. M. World report on child injury prevention. World Health Organization, 2008.
Riley, Joanne E., Michael S. Roys, and Sandra M. Cayless. "Initial assessment of children's ability to climb stair guarding." The journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 118, no. 6 (1998): 331-337.
Brown, Ann. "Dear Colleague." Nursing Management 30, no. 1 (1999): 6-7. US CPSC, Publication No. 330, (un-dated), dbs.idaho.gov/programs/school/publications/Bleachers.pdf
Salas, Tom, "Foolproof Cable Railings -
If the posts and rails are properly designed and installed, the cables should never come loose", Professional Deck Builder, June 2015, retrieved 25 Aug 2015, original source: http://www.deckmagazine.com/fencing-and-railing/foolproof-cable-railings_o.aspx - Excerpt: The most common cable-rail problem I’ve seen occurs when someone tries to convert a conventional balustrade with 4x4 wood posts, 2x6 top rails, and 2x2 pickets to a cable rail by removing the pickets, drilling the posts, and installing a cable kit. Because the compression created by the cables bears on the top rail, the post-to-rail connections, and the outermost posts, the outer posts will bow inward over time from the pull of the cables, even if the posts are well-attached to the framing and meet code. This will lead to an endless cycle of retightening cables and more post bowing. When properly installed, however, wood posts are just as effective as metal posts, and I think no rail is more beautiful than a clear redwood or red cedar post system with cables. I won’t install cable on a 4x4 post, however; the posts must be 6x6 or 4x6, with the long dimension parallel to the cables.
Shields, Brenda J., Elizabeth Burkett, and Gary A. Smith. "Epidemiology of balcony fall–related injuries, United States, 1990-2006." The American journal of emergency medicine 29, no. 2 (2011): 174-180.
Towner, Elizabeth, and Heather Ward. "Prevention of injuries to children and young people: the way ahead for the UK." Injury prevention 4, no. suppl 1 (1998): S17-S25.
Continue reading at HANDRAILS & HANDRAILINGS or select a topic from the More Reading links or topic ARTICLE INDEX shown below.
Try the search box below or CONTACT US by email if you cannot find the answer you need at InspectApedia.
what building codes regulate the use of cables on guardrailings?
The stainless steel cables are used in commercial, what's the IBC on cables in guards? - Scott Emerson 8/18/12
Thanks for the question, Scott. We do find both horizontal and vertical cable guardrailings installed in commercial locations such as the shopping center shown in photos earlier on this page, but ultimately the approval is up to local code enforcement officials. As for specific code requirements, the railings have to pass the same height, strength, spacing, and graspability rules as other types of railings. Please take a look at the article above and also see references  and let me know if questions remain.
Question: Can the top rail of a guardrailing or stair rail be cable?
(May 18, 2014) bill blackburn said:
I find nowhere on the internet a specific reference to the code requirement for a rigid top rail in a cable guardrail system. Can the top rail be cable? (assuming a substantial anchor post and adequate cable tension) I am referring to an elevated deck, not stairs.
The top rail and entire assembly requirements are generally specified as strength and height and spacing requirements.
See GUARDRAIL & HANDRAIL STRENGTH for examples of the requirement for a top railing along a glass guardrail. Similar restrictions would pertain to a cable type guardrail system.
Question: is it necessary to connect the cable guardrail to each baluster?
(May 20, 2015) Anonymous said:
does stainless cable hardware have to be placed on each baluster? How many feet of stainless cable between tighteners to create maximum tension?
Anon I cannot answer your tension question about an unknown design, but in general the object would be to support the cable at intervals and tighten it sufficiently that it will meet the guidelines for baluster spacing, head traps, etc. The specifics for your guardrail would have to consider the cable diameter and support spacing intervals as well as area where it's to be used. Note that the article above includes other warnings.
Anon: cable guardrails that are run horizontally extend between posts, not balusters. The post spacing is not specified but rather the post spacing plus cable railing tension should be close enough and tight enough to prevent deflection that exceeds the typical baluster 4-inch spacing guideline; nevertheless, because the horizontal cables are climbable the design is still hazardous for children.
(June 20, 2015) bibi said:
are cable railing system for front porch legal in new jersey (residential)?
Reader Question: are cable railings permitted by OSHA?
(Aug 5, 2015) Fran said:
Can these cables be applied for OSHA guardrailing?
There is not an explicit discussion of cable railings and guardrails in the OSHA language, as you'll see in the citation below.
Use the "Click to Show or Hide FAQs" link just above to see recently-posted questions, comments, replies, try the search box just below, or if you prefer, post a question or comment in the Comments box below and we will respond promptly.
Home Inspection Education Home Study Courses - ASHI@Home Training 10-course program. Special Offer: Carson Dunlop Associates offers InspectAPedia readers in the U.S.A. a 5% discount on these courses: Enter INSPECTAHITP in the order payment page "Promo/Redemption" space. InspectAPedia.com editor Daniel Friedman is a contributing author.
The Home Reference Book, a reference & inspection report product for building owners & inspectors. Special Offer: For a 10% discount on any number of copies of the Home Reference Book purchased as a single order. Enter INSPECTAHRB in the order payment page "Promo/Redemption" space. InspectAPedia.com editor Daniel Friedman is a contributing author.
The Home Reference eBook, an electronic version for PCs, the iPad, iPhone, & Android smart phones. Special Offer: For a 5% discount on any number of copies of the Home Reference eBook purchased as a single order. Enter inspectaehrb in the order payment page "Promo/Redemption" space.
The Illustrated Home illustrates construction details and building components, a reference for owners & inspectors. Special Offer: For a 5% discount on any number of copies of the Illustrated Home purchased as a single order Enter INSPECTAILL in the order payment page "Promo/Redemption" space.
The Horizon Software System manages business operations,scheduling, & inspection report writing using Carson Dunlop's knowledge base & color images. The Horizon system runs on always-available cloud-based software for office computers, laptops, tablets, iPad, Android, & other smartphones.
Eric Galow, Galow Homes, Lagrangeville, NY. Mr. Galow can be reached by email: email@example.com or by telephone: 914-474-6613. Mr. Galow specializes in residential construction including both new homes and repairs, renovations, and additions.
 §3209. Standard Guardrails, California Building Code, provides description of how guard rails should be constructed. Web search 09/02/2011,original source: www.dir.ca.gov/title8/3209.html
 "The Elimination of Unsafe Guardrails, a Progress Report," Elliott O. Stephenson, Building Standards, March-April 1993
 "Are Functional Handrails Within Our Grasp" Jake Pauls, Building Standards, January-February 1991
 Access Ramp building codes:
 Access Ramp Standards:
ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act), Public Law 101-336. 7/26/90 is very often cited by other sources for good design of stairs and ramps etc. even where disabled individuals are not the design target.
ANSI A117.4 Accessible and Usable buildings and Facilities (earlier version was incorporated into the ADA)
ASTM F 1637, Standard Practice for Safe Walking Surfaces, (Similar to the above standard
 Falls and Related Injuries: Slips, Trips, Missteps, and Their Consequences, Lawyers & Judges Publishing, (June 2002), ISBN-10: 0913875430 ISBN-13: 978-0913875438 "Falls in the home and public places are the second leading cause of unintentional injury deaths in the United States, but are overlooked in most literature. This book is unique in that it is entirely devoted to falls. Of use to primary care physicians, nurses, insurance adjusters, architects, writers of building codes, attorneys, or anyone who cares for the elderly, this book will tell you how, why, and when people will likely fall, what most likely will be injured, and how such injuries come about. "
 The National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST (nee National Bureau of Standards NBS) is a US government agency - see www.nist.gov
"A Parametric Study of Wall Moisture Contents Using a Revised Variable Indoor Relative Humidity Version of the "Moist" Transient Heat and Moisture Transfer Model [copy on file as/interiors/MOIST_Model_NIST_b95074.pdf ] - ", George Tsongas, Doug Burch, Carolyn Roos, Malcom Cunningham; this paper describes software and the prediction of wall moisture contents. - PDF Document from NIS
 Slips, Trips, Missteps and Their Consequences, Second Edition, Gary M. Bakken, H. Harvey Cohen,A. S. Hyde, Jon R. Abele, ISBN-13: 978-1-933264-01-1 or
ISBN 10: 1-933264-01-2,
available from the publisher, Lawyers ^ Judges Publishing Company,Inc., www.lawyersandjudges.com firstname.lastname@example.org and also from the InspectAPedia Bookstore (Amazon.com)
 The Stairway Manufacturers' Association, (877) 500-5759, provides a pictorial guide to the stair and railing portion of the International Residential Code. [copy on file as http://www.stairways.org/pdf/2006%20Stair%20IRC%20SCREEN.pdf ] -
 Mold-Resistant Building Practices, advice from an expert on how to prevent mold after a building flood and how to prevent mold growth in buildings by selection of building materials and by anti-mold construction details.
 "The Dimensions of Stairs", J. M. Fitch et al., Scientific American, October 1974.
 Stair & Walkway Standards for Slipperiness or Coefficient of Friction (COF) or Static Coefficient of Friction (SCOF)
ASTM D-21, and ASTM D2047
UL-410 (similar to ASTM D-21)
NSFI 101-B (National Floor Safety Institute)
NSFI Walkway Auditing Guideline (WAG) Ref. 101-A& 101-B (may appear as ANSI B101.0) sets rules for measuring walkway slip resist
OSHA - (Dept of Labor CFR 1910.22 does not specify COF and pertains to workplaces) but recognizes the need for a "qualified person" to evaluate walkway slipperiness
ADA (relies on the ANSI and ASTM standards)
 A. Sacher, International Symposium on Slip Resistance: The Interface of Man, Footwear, and Walking Surfaces, Journal of Testing and Evaluation (JTE), ISSN: 1945-7553, January 1997 [more focused on slipperiness of polished surfaces
 Algae is widely recognized as a slippery surface - a Google web search for "how slippery is algae on steps" produced more than 15,000 results on 8/29/12)
 Slipperiness of algae on walking surfaces, warning, Royal Horticultural Society, retrieved 8/29/2012, original source: http://apps.rhs.org.uk/advicesearch/profile.aspx?pid=418
 Slipperiness of algae: "Watch your step, wet rocks and algae are slippery" Oregon State University warning 1977 retrieved 8/29/2012, original source: http://www.worldcat.org/title/watch-your-step-wet-rocks-and-algae-are-slippery/oclc/663683915
 Coefficient of friction of algae on surfaces [like stair treads]: Delphine Gourdon, Qi Lin, Emin Oroudjev, Helen Hansma, Yuval Golan, Shoshana Arad, and Jacob Israelachvili, "Adhesion and Stable Low Friction Provided by a Subnanometer-Thick Monolayer of a Natural Polysaccharide", Langmuir, 2008 pp 1534-1540, American Chemical Society,
retrieved 8/29/2012, Abstract: Using a surface forces apparatus, we have investigated the adhesive and lubrication forces of mica surfaces separated by a molecularly thin, subnanometer film of a high-molecular-weight (2.3 MDa) anionic polysaccharide from the algae Porphyridium sp. adsorbed from aqueous solution. The adhesion and friction forces of the confined biopolymer were monitored as a function of time, shearing distance, and driving velocity under a large range of compressive loads (pressures). Although the thickness of the dilute polysaccharide was <1 nm, the friction was low (coefficient of friction = 0.015), and no wear was ever observed even at a pressure of 110 atm over 3 decades of velocity, so long as the shearing distances were less than twice the contact diameter. Atomic force microscopy in solution shows that the biopolymer is able to adsorb to the mica surface but remains mobile and easily dragged upon shearing. The adhesion (adsorption) of this polysaccharide even to negatively charged surfaces, its stable low friction, its robustness (high-load carrying capacity and good wear protection), and the weak (logarithmic) dependence of the friction force on the sliding velocity make this class of polyelectrolytes excellent candidates for use in water-based lubricant fluids and as potential additives to synovial fluid in joints and other biolubricating fluids. The physical reasons for the remarkable tribological properties of the ultrathin polysaccharide monolayer are discussed and appear to be quite different from those of other polyelectrolytes and proteins that act as thick “polymer brush” layers.
 Jason R. Stokes, Lubica Macakova, Agnieszka Chojnicka-Paszun, Cornelis G. de Kruif, and Harmen H. J. de Jongh, "Lubrication, Adsorption, and Rheology of Aqueous Polysaccharide Solutions, Langmuir 2011 27 (7), 3474-3484
 "Coefficients of Friction for Ice", The Physics Factbook™, Glenn Elert, Ed., retrieved 8/29/12, original source: http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2004/GennaAbleman.shtml
 "Coefficients of Friction for Ice", The University of the State of New York Reference Tables for Physical Setting/Physics. New York: The State Education Department, 2002. Op. Cit.
 Serway Physics for Scientists and Engineers 4th edition (p. 126.)
 "How Slippery Is It", retrieved 8/29/12, original source http://www.icebike.org/Articles/howslippery.htm
 John E. Hunter, "Friction Values", The Source, Society of Accident Reconstructionists, Winter 1998. Study of frictional values of car tires involved in collisions on snow or ice covered roadways.
 Frictional Coefficients of some Common Materials and Materials Combinations, The Engineering Toolbox, retrieved 8/29/2012, original source: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/friction-coefficients-d_778.html [copy on file as Friction and Coefficients of Friction.pdf ]
 Stairways and Ladders, A Guide to OSHA Rules, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, 3124-12R 2003 - Web Search 05/28/2010 original source: http://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3124.pdf. OSHA regulations govern standards in the construction industry and in the workforce Quoting from OSHA whose focus is on workplace safety and so excludes discussion of falls and stair-falls in private homes:
OSHA estimates that there are 24,882 injuries and as many as 36 fatalities per year due to falls from stairways and ladders used in construction. Nearly half of these injuries are serious enough to require time off the job--11,570 lost workday injuries and 13,312 non-lost workday injuries occur annually due to falls from stairways and ladders used in construction. These data demonstrate that work on and around ladders and stairways is hazardous. More importantly, they show that compliance with OSHA's requirements for the safe use of ladders and stairways could have prevented many of these injuries. -osha.gov/doc/outreachtraining/htmlfiles/stairlad.html
 International Building Code, Stairway Provisions, Section 1009: Stairways and Handrails, retrieved 8/29/12, original source: http://www.amezz.com/ibc-stairs-code.htm [copy on file as IBC Stairs Code.pdf]
 Model Building Code, Chapter 10, Means of Egress, retrieved 8/29/12, original source: http://www2.iccsafe.org/states/newjersey/NJ_Building/PDFs/NJ_Bldg_Chapter10.pdf, [copy on file as NJ_Bldg_Chapter10.pdf] adopted, for example by New Jersey. International Code Council, 500 New Jersey Avenue, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20001, Tel: 800-786-4452
Atlantis Rail, division of Suncor Stainless, Inc.,
Atlantis Rail Systems
70 Armstrong Road
Plymouth, MA 02360
Toll free: 800-541-6829
 The Wagner Companies
0600 West Brown Deer Rd.
Milwaukee, WI 53224
 Keuka Studios:
1011 Rush Henrietta Town Line Rd.
Rush, NY 14543
Phone: Toll Free (855) 454-5678
Main: (585) 487-6148
Fax: (585) 487-6150
 Building Code Rules for Stair Rail Cables - Wire Rope Guardrails & Stair Railings
UBC 1003.3.3 1997
 The International Building Code (IBC)
International Residential Code (IRC)
 ISO 9001:2008
 1003.3.3.11.3 Handrail grasp ability. Handrails with a circular cross section shall have an outside diameter of at least 1.25 inches (32 mm) and not greater than 2 inches (51 mm) or shall provide equivalent grasp ability. If the handrail is not circular, it shall have a perimeter dimension of at least 4 inches (102 mm) and not greater than 6.25 inches (159 mm) with a maximum cross-section dimension of 2.25 inches (57 mm). Edges shall have a minimum radius of 0.125 inch (3.2 mm).
 BOCA National Property Maintenance Code 1993:
PM-305.5 Stairs and railings: all interior stairs and railings shall be maintained in sound condition and good repair.
Commentary: Handrails, treads and risers must be structurally sound, firmly attached to the structure, and properly maintained to perform their intended function safely. During an inspection the code official should inspect all stringers, risers, treads, and handrails.
PM-305.6 Handrails and guards: Every handrail and guard shall be firmly fastened and capable of supporting normally imposed loads and shall be maintained in good condition.
Commentary: This section provides for the safety and maintenance of handrails and guards. See Section PM-702.9 for additional requirements.
PM-702.9 Stairways, handrails and guards: Every exterior and interior flight of stairs having more than four risers, and every open portion of a stair, landing or balcony which is more than 30 inches (762mm) high, nor more than 42 inches (1067mm) high, measured vertically above the nosing of the tread or above the finished floor of the landing or walking surfaces. Guards shall be not less than 30 inches (762mm) high above the floor of the landing or balcony.
Commentary: Handrails are required on all stairs more than four risers in height. Handrails cannot be less than 30 inches nor more than 42 inches above the nosing of the treads (see Figure PM-702.9).
Guards are required on the open side of stairs and on landings and balconies which are more than 30 inches above the floor or grade below. The guard must be at least 30 inches above the floor of the landing or balcony. Guards are to contain intermediate rails, balusters or other construction to reduce the chance of an adult or child from falling through the guard. If the guard is missing some intermediate rails or balustrades, it is recommended that the guard be repaired to its original condition if it will provide protection equivalent to the protection it provided when originally constructed.
Books & Articles on Building & Environmental Inspection, Testing, Diagnosis, & Repair
Carson, Dunlop & Associates Ltd., 120 Carlton Street Suite 407, Toronto ON M5A 4K2. Tel: (416) 964-9415 1-800-268-7070 Email: email@example.com. The firm provides professional home inspection services & home inspection education & publications. Alan Carson is a past president of ASHI, the American Society of Home Inspectors. Thanks to Alan Carson and Bob Dunlop, for permission for InspectAPedia to use text excerpts from The Home Reference Book & illustrations from The Illustrated Home. Carson Dunlop Associates' provides extensive home inspection education and report writing material.
The Illustrated Home illustrates construction details and building components, a reference for owners & inspectors. Special Offer: For a 5% discount on any number of copies of the Illustrated Home purchased as a single order Enter INSPECTAILL in the order payment page "Promo/Redemption" space.
TECHNICAL REFERENCE GUIDE to manufacturer's model and serial number information for heating and cooling equipment, useful for determining the age of heating boilers, furnaces, water heaters is provided by Carson Dunlop, Associates, Toronto - Carson Dunlop Weldon & Associates Special Offer: Carson Dunlop Associates offers InspectAPedia readers in the U.S.A. a 5% discount on any number of copies of the Technical Reference Guide purchased as a single order. Just enter INSPECTATRG in the order payment page "Promo/Redemption" space.
The Home Reference Book - the Encyclopedia of Homes, Carson Dunlop & Associates, Toronto, Ontario, 25th Ed., 2012, is a bound volume of more than 450 illustrated pages that assist home inspectors and home owners in the inspection and detection of problems on buildings. The text is intended as a reference guide to help building owners operate and maintain their home effectively. Field inspection worksheets are included at the back of the volume.
Special Offer: For a 10% discount on any number of copies of the Home Reference Book purchased as a single order. Enter INSPECTAHRB in the order payment page "Promo/Redemption" space. InspectAPedia.com editor Daniel Friedman is a contributing author.
Special Offer: Carson Dunlop Associates offers InspectAPedia readers in the U.S.A. a 5% discount on these courses: Enter INSPECTAHITP in the order payment page "Promo/Redemption" space. InspectAPedia.com editor Daniel Friedman is a contributing author.
The Horizon Software System manages business operations,scheduling, & inspection report writing using Carson Dunlop's knowledge base & color images. The Horizon system runs on always-available cloud-based software for office computers, laptops, tablets, iPad, Android, & other smartphones
Support InspectApedia.com & See Fewer Advertisements
From Google's Contributor website: Contribute a few dollars each month. See fewer ads. The money you contribute helps fund the sites you visit.