InspectAPedia ® | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Building & Environmental Inspection, Testing, Diagnosis, Repair, & Problem Prevention Advice |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| InspectAPedia Home |
| | Air Conditioning |
| | Electrical | | | Indoor Environment |
| | Exteriors | | | Heating | | | Home Inspection |
| | Insulate Ventilate |
| | Interiors | | | Mold Inspect/Test |
| | Plumbing Water Septic |
| | Roofing | | | Structure | | | Contact Us |
| Directory of Professionals to Inspect or Test a Building | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS - INSPECT, TEST, REMEDY Enviro-Scare, the Cycle of Public Fear WHAT IS EMF? EMF Cancer Scare Levels of Cancer Risk Prioritizing Risks EMF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS EMF MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES What is "Enviro-Scare" UFFI Enviro-Scare Asbestos Enviro-Scare RADON HAZARD TESTS & MITIGATION Radon Enviro-Scare Lead Enviro-Scare EMF Enviro-Scare Mold Enviro-Scare Fiberglass Enviro-Scare Environmental Fear Effects on Property Values References WORKPLACE EXPOSURE to Electromagnetic Fields WORKSHEET for EMF MEASUREMENTS WORKSHEET for EMF MEASUREMENTS - Example Electromagnetic Radiation Field EMF SURVEY Procedure Basketball Mold Syndrome - BBMS Mold Enviro-Scare More Information InspectAPedia® Home & Site Map Air Conditioning & Heat Pumps Bookstore Electrical Environment Exteriors Heating Home Inspection Insulate Ventilate Interiors Mold Inspect/Test Plumbing Water Septic Roofing Structure Accuracy & Bias Pledge Contact Us |
This paper discusses electromagnetic radiation or electromagnetic fields (EMF) as a possible cancer risk and offers a brief analysis of the probable cancer risk from EMF compared with other hazards. It graphs the effect of fear of power lines and EMF exposure as well as other environmental concerns as it affects property values over time. Our page top photo shows an electrical worker repairing a local electrical power distribution line. Electrical workers, because they are regularly have close exposure to strong electrical fields, are a group that has been closely studied for correlation between cancer occurrence and electrical field exposure. See WORKPLACE EXPOSURE to Electromagnetic Fields for more information on workplace exposure to EMF. We define "Enviro-Scare" (ES) and we use this cyclic fear pattern to describe the variation and effects of the level of public environmental worry by recapping the enviro-scare history of asbestos, EMF, UFFI, and other environmental concerns. The red graph depicts the varying level of ES or public fear for a given environmental concern. ES generally increases, peaks, and then diminishes over time, independently of the actual level of risk. As people become acclimated to the particular topic it loses its initial shock value. Links to other resources include EMF Procedures & Causes of EMF Measurement Error & Variation . © Copyright 2009 Daniel Friedman, All Rights Reserved. Information Accuracy & Bias Pledge is at below-left. Use links at the left of each page to navigate this document or to view other topics at this website. Green links show where you are in our document or website. Understanding Levels of Absolute Cancer Risk from Levels of Electromagnetic Field ExposureHere is a summary of the actual health risks and property value risks associated with EMF, electromagnetic fields. To date (February 2009) we know of no Federal nor State accepted standard for allowable exposure to EMF. My information is based on our understanding of current literature on this topic. When set, standards for acceptable levels of EMF exposure may then be higher or lower than 2 milligauss. Measurements at the same site can vary widely because of variations in the load on the electric transmission facility and because of other variables discussed at my Suggested EMF Measurement Procedures and Measurement Variability Paper. Measurements also vary widely if a standard procedure is not followed. Very often EMF levels are not constant at all locations on a property. Using a procedure which may reduce this problem, I report measurements made at a series of standard locations and sometimes also at locations of special interest. I have made this procedure available to other professionals and I invite critique, feedback, and suggestions. For currently popular concerns, economic risks to property owners remain even if there is no demonstrable health hazard. I call the cycle of increasing, peaking, then declining consumer fear "enviro-scare." The economic impact on property owners of these topics depends on this cycle. One of my EMF measuring equipment manufacturers reports the following: " Magnetic radiation readings of 1 milligauss and less are considered below those which were shown to increase the level of leukemia in several medical epidemiological studies in the greater Denver area." "Readings in the 1 to 3 milliGauss range were found to double the leukemia rate in children in the Denver studies." "Some epidemiological studies indicate a higher than normal incidence of cancer, including leukemia and brain tumors, among children and adults living or working close to power lines." Time Magazine, July 17, 1989. "Dr. Savitz mentioned 2 milliGauss as the level at which cancer is produced in children. In the home of these people, I have measured 10 to 12 milliGauss, depending on how much current is flowing down the line." House of Representatives, 100th Congress. I (DJ Friedman) have regularly found background levels of .5 to 1 milliGauss at residential properties, and higher levels in urban environments. It's unusual to find an urban or even suburban environment with lower EMF levels than .5-2 milligauss. What does "double the risk of leukemia" really mean as true measure of danger?Telling a prospective home buyer or home owner that "Exposure of your child to a 2 milligauss field can double his risk of childhood leukemia." is frightening. The statement may be true, but stated alone, this admonition lacks a very important perspective. An informed viewpoint is very important for every environmental hazard. Let's review again the opening statement about "doubling cancer risk." At the risk levels discussed in the Werth study, "doubling the risk of childhood leukemia" means increasing the chances from about 1 in 10,000 to 2 in 10,000. In either case, the risk is extremely low -- much less than the risks posed by a large number of much more common hazards to which people are exposed daily. Importance of Identifying and Prioritizing Cancer & Other Health & Safety RisksCancer Risk from Lawn Herbicides is Greater than from Electromagnetic FieldsA Friday, March 26 editorial in the New York Poughkeepsie Journal, "Don't mix kids and chemicals." The editorial mentions a 1987 National Cancer institute study which "... found that children who lived in homes where lawn chemicals were applied were six times more likely to develop leukemia." In other words, your lawn may be more dangerous than a 2 mg EMF. Based on current research, EMF may be near the bottom of risks to children. [In fact one wonders if some of the leukemia cases reported for children living along a power line right of way might have been influenced less by the EMF than by the strong herbicides commonly used by power companies to hold down brush growth under the power lines. Readers might review the Agent Orange issue affecting veterans of the Vietnam war, for example.] While this and any health hazard may change as new data is developed, consumers who are concerned with the health of their children should consider all risks and should, when worrying about individual ones such as EMR, keep them in perspective. If ones objective is to stay healthy and alive, a rational approach identifies and responds to risks first by identifying the most-significant ones and making sure that those concerns have been addressed. ... Technical Reviewers & References
Use links just below or at the left of each page to navigate this document or to view other topics at this website. Green links show where you are in our document or website. ENVIRO-SCARE, EMF & Property Values | ||||||
|
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS - INSPECT, TEST, REMEDY
Air Filtration Allergens Asbestos in Buildings ASBESTOS: Photo Guide to Materials / Products Asbestos-Free Insulation Materials Carbon Nanotube Materials Carpet Dust Carpeting and Indoor Air Quality Cell phones Chimneys Fireplaces Disinfectants Drinking Water Enviro-Scare EMF EMF Enviro-Scare Exteriors Fiberglass Hazards Fiberglass Enviro-Scare Gas Toxicity Levels Toxic Gas Exposure Effects Heating Systems Indoor Air Quality Insulation Material Identification Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation UFFI LEAD POISONING HAZARDS GUIDE LEAD CONTAMINATION HAZARDS in the HOME LEAD CONTAMINATION in WATER, HOW to TEST LP & Natural Gas Safety Hazards Legionella Legionnaires' Disease Mold Action Guide Mold Growth Resistance of Foam Insulation Mold Inspect, Test, Remove, Prevent Website ODORS, Smells, Gases in Buildings-Diagnosis & Cure Oil Tanks Home Pet Dander Pollen Photos RADON HAZARD TESTS & MITIGATION Radon Enviro-Scare Stain Diagnosis Septic Systems Sewage backup Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation UFFI Water Testing Water Test Advice Water Tests & Fees WTC Dust Photos More Information InspectAPedia Blog - News Updates Air Conditioning & Heat Pumps Bookstore Electrical Environment Exteriors Heating Home Inspection Insulate Ventilate Interiors Mold Inspect/Test Plumbing Water Septic Roofing Structure Accuracy & Bias Pledge Contact Us |
More Information on Building Diagnostic Inspections and Repairs
|
02/17/2009 - 10/25/1988 - InspectAPedia.com/emf/EMF_Cancer_Risk_Levels.htm - © 2009 - 1988 Copyright Daniel Friedman All Rights Reserved - InspectAPedia® is a Registered U.S. Trademark