Free Encyclopedia of Building & Environmental Inspection, Testing, Diagnosis, Repair

Ask a Question or Search InspectAPedia

• HOME
• AIR CONDITIONING
• ELECTRICAL
• EXTERIORS
• HEATING
• HOME INSPECTION
• INTERIORS
• PLUMBING
• ROOFING
• SEPTIC SYSTEMS
• STRUCTURE
• WATER SUPPLY

• ENERGY SAVINGS
• ENVIRONMENT
• INDOOR AIR IAQ
• INSULATION
• MOLD INSPECT TEST REMOVE
• NOISE
• ODORS
• SOLAR ENERGY
• VENTILATION
• EXPERTS DIRECTORY
• CONTACT US

This article addresses the occasional claims by parties with conflicting interests, such as home sellers, real estate agents or attorneys representing sellers or other interests who sometimes state that there is no Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok hazard or cite the absence of a final government recall as a reason to assume that no action is justified. We include links to public documents concerning legal and safety issues surrounding this equipment and we link to articles offering FPE panel replacement advice and money-saving alternatives.

The bottom line on FPE Stab-Lok equipment: The FPE Stab-Lok Panel is a latent fire hazard. The panel or its entire bus assembly should be replaced, not simply some or all of the FPE Stab-Lok circuit breakers. Replacement cost ranges from $800 to $2000. There is no useful FPE recall, warranty, or other financial relief. See FPE REPLACEMENT PANELS.

Making printed copies of this document is permitted. Electronic reproduction or copying of our website pages and articles in any other form is prohibited, with this exception: we provide FPE Stab-Lok Hazard Summary Page for Public Use that can be freely copied in print or electronic form and that can be copied (without modification) to other websites.

© Copyright 2012 InspectAPedia.com, All Rights Reserved. Information Accuracy & Bias Pledge is at below-left. Use page top links to major topics or use links at the left of each page to navigate within topics and documents at this website. Green links show where you are in a document series or at this website.

A summary of the FPE hazard and FPE electrical panel repair / replacement recommendations

This Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok Electrical Panel replacement advice discusses the real hazards of FPE Electric Stab Lok panels and FPE circuit breakers.

Home buyers and home inspectors who encounter a difference of opinion about FPE Stab-Lok equipment expressed by a home seller, seller's attorney, or real estate agent, sometimes report the view that because there was no US Government recall of FPE Stab-Lok electrical panels, there is no concern regarding that equipment. The hazard: FPE Stab-Lok circuit breakers fail to trip - a fire risk The articles and field reports at FEDERAL PACIFIC FPE HAZARDS are from neutral party experts, electricians, and home owners who make clear that the FPE Stab-Lok circuit breaker and panel hazard is a serious but latent fire hazard.. "Latent hazard" means, simply having an FPE Stab-Lok electrical panel in a home does not itself initiate a failure or fire. The problem is that FPE breakers often don't trip when they should in order to prevent a fire - at a failure rate of up to 60 % of the time - a much higher failure rate than most other circuit breakers. References that support this conclusion are at FPE Stab-Lok HAZARDS & REPAIRS WEBSITE Conflicts of interest: OPINION: people who assert that this product is not a concern are speaking from a position of conflicting interest (wanting to sell a house for the most profit, or wanting to protect corporate assets from liability claims). This viewpoint does not include a concern for the safety of the next occupants of a building served by an FPE Stab-Lok electrical panel.

Do not rely on electrical panel age as a guarantee of safety

Do not rely on electrical panel age, nor on an "inspection" by an electrician or home inspector or building inspector as "proof" that the electrical panel is or is not as safe and reliable as other brands. Don't rely on a home owner, seller, real estate agent, or anyone else who says "it's been fine so far" either.

FACT: Saying that an FPE Stab-Lok panel has "performed just fine up to now" is not a reliable indicator of its safety.

OPINION: If you are never in an auto crash the fact that your seatbelt is hanging by a thread will never be noticed.

What if the FPE Panel Looks OK and No Problems Have Occurred in a Particular Home?

What if up to now there has been no evidence of a "failure" in a home serviced by a Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok electrical panel? If you haven't seen FPE failures yourself (a sample of "one" is not statistically meaningful), instead see REPORTS OF FPE FAILURES which is a collection of field failure reports, fires, overheats, and FPE problems which has over 130 entries (and more on file waiting to be entered). In the Federal Pacific Electric Stab-lok™ panel bus assembly shown here, the equipment "looked fine" to the home inspector, home owner, home buyer, real estate agent, and everyone else, until the licensed electrician, someone familiar with FPE failures, removed a few circuit breakers to show the burning bus-to-breaker connections in the electrical panel. Considering that only 2% to 5% of electrical failures are ever reported to any collecting authority, this is significant data.

Why have some homes with FPE Stab-Lok breakers & panels "never seen a problem"?

Past history is no promise of future: Statements about this equipment by an owner or realtor that "there has never been a problem in this building" are not a safe predictor of what can happen in the future. It may simply be the case that the circuit breakers have not been called-on to respond to an overload condition. An overcurrent or short circuit - hazards against which circuit breakers are designed to protect the home and its occupants - may not have occurred at a particular property.

If no electrical circuit in the building ever has had a reason to trip a circuit breaker, no one will have ever seen the "FPE no-trip" problem. But when one of these breakers should trip to turn off power to prevent a fire, there is a significant t chance that it won't.

Federal Pacific Electric Panel Recalls - FPE Stab-Lok Recalls

If you are looking for a federal recall notice you won't find it. Although Federal Pacific Electric lost it's UL listing for a time, it subsequently went out of business. There was no product recall issued in the U.S. (There was a product recall of some Canadian products under the Federal Pioneer brand version of this panel.) Instead of relying on the presence or absence of a government-ordered product recall, in this case we suggest reading the test data cited at the FPE Stab-Lok information website, the court findings of fraud by FPE, and the many field reports of failures and even fires. The FPE hazard is real, well defined, and unambiguous.

The absence of a recall of FPE Stab-lok electrical panels does not mean the absence of a problem. Aluminum wiring is a recognized fire hazard but was never "recalled". Do not waste time looking for an FPE product recall, FPE warranty claim, or FPE panel replacement money: there isn't any except for a successful class action lawsuit that affects some New Jersey homeowners and an older Federal Pioneer (same product different label) recall for some Canadian equipment. FPE and FP product recalls are discussed further below.

Extensive independent tests as well as field incident reports confirm that having a Stab-Lok electrical panel is similar to the risk of having put a penny in a fuse socket instead of a fuse. The FPE Stab-Lok photograph shown here is an example of a circuit breaker which failed with an arcing incident sufficient to burn out and blow out the side of the circuit breaker case. Pennies in fuse sockets are a recognized electrical fire hazard but have never been specifically addressed by recall nor by explicit legislation.

OPINION: Relying on a product recall is like believing that there is no crime because we have police departments or believing that there are no auto accidents because cars have brakes. There can be real hazards without a recall. There has been no recall of pennies put in fuse sockets, for example.

How to identify FPE Stab-Lok Electrical Equipment

Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok (TM) panels and breakers are easily identified by markings on the panel front face (inside the door), writing on paper labels that may glued to the inside of the panel cover or inside the panel enclosure, the appearance of the circuit breakers, and unique appearance of the panel bus design (that breakers are plugged into). Some of these details can be observed safely only by a licensed electrician who can remove circuit breakers but most of them are easily observed by a homeowner. See HOW TO IDENTIFY FPE & FP for help on how to identify or recognize Federal Pacific Electric FPE Stab Lok circuit breakers and electrical panels - Product Identification photos and advice" helps identify Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok equipment.

Federal Pacific Electric Stab Lok Panels Should Be Replaced not "Repaired"

SAFETY WARNING: we advise against purchasing replacement FPE Federal Pacific Electric Stab-Lok circuit breakers or panel parts. Data indicates that these replacement parts do not perform more safely than old or original FPE parts, and other innate safety concerns with the panel and bus assembly also would remain in place. The FPE Stab-Lok electrical panel and its part should be replaced entirely.

Do not just replace the FPE circuit breakers, and do not install substitute or "replacement" FPE breakers that "fit" in the panel. We have yet to be supplied with independent test data indicating that these new breakers perform any better than the originals, and we have received field reports of failures and burn-ups with "new" and "replacement" FPE breakers. Furthermore, there are FPE panel bus, bus-to-breaker connections, and panel connection problems that appear to contribute to panel and breaker failures. Replace the Panel If the electrical panel or circuit breakers are identified as Federal Pacific Electric or "Stab Lok" the electrical panel should be replaced and a new panel with new breakers installed. The FPE REPLACEMENT PANELS link at page left offers some alternatives and can save you some money.

The FPE Stab-Lok electrical panel should be replaced. No new breakers, no inspections, no tests. Replaced.

Who should pay for replacement of a Federal Pacific Electric Company Stab-Lok Panel?

Don't look to the government: We know of no meaningful program offered by any company nor government agency which provides financial assistance for the replacement of this unsafe electrical panel. This FPE photograph is of the backside of the electrical panel bus assembly where an overheating condition and "meltdown" are occurring. This damage could not be seen unless the panel is taken out of the enclosure.

So who pays?: Home buyers and some home sellers often ask us who should pay for replacement of this unsafe electrical panel. Our opinion is that the panel is unsafe and should be replaced, but we are a neutral party with regard to who should pay for this repair.

Payment or allowance for addressing any substantive defect discovered at a property being purchased is a matter for negotiation between the parties, with advice from their attorney and real estate agent.

What does it cost?: Typical installation of a new 100-Amp electrical panel in the U.S. ranges from $900. to $2800. including parts and labor - not significant as a portion of value of a home. Some replacement methods (steel panel enclosure reuse) may reduce that cost in some cases..

Working in a tight space, installing a higher ampacity electrical panel, or other considerations might push this cost up closer to that higher $2800. figure. The cost of replacing an FPE Stab-Lok panel can sometimes be reduced if the electrician agrees that it is suitable to re-use the original steel panel enclosure, inserting a new bus assembly and breakers, because the labor of rerouting wires is eliminated. That option is suitable only if the service size and thus the panel enclosure size is large enough to meet modern requirements. See REPLACEMENT PANELS.

OPINION: It is unfortunate when a building seller, real estate agent, or their attorney put the safety of future occupants of a building at risk by attempting to head off negotiation on this particular defect by asserting that there is no hazard. The risks are well documented by both field reports and independent lab testing. The cost to cure this common building defect is quite small compared with the value or purchase price of almost any building. An owner or real estate agent who is informed about this safety hazard and who fails to disclose this condition to another future buyer may be liable for real estate fraud as well as for any ensuing loss.

Because the safety of the future occupants of the building as well as the building itself are at risk, the new owner should assure that the panel is replaced, regardless of who pays for it. If the building is not being sold, certainly the current owner should have this safety hazard corrected promptly.

• Who pays for the replacement electrical panel? We are a neutral party concerning who pays (buyer or seller of a property) but we suggest that the panel should be replaced promptly.

  Our opinion is that a building seller is not required by state or federal law to fix anything and in fact could be assuming liability by doing so. However some lenders or insurance companies may require that certain safety or other building defects be repaired before issuing a mortgage or an insurance policy.

  Our opinion is that similarly, a seller is not obligated to discount their property because of the need for an electrical panel replacement - that's something that is negotiable between buyer and seller.

  But if a seller agrees to assume all or part of the cost of repairing a building defect in the building being sold, there are some reasons why it's better to give the buyer a fair allowance than for the seller to actually perform the work. By making an allowance to the buyer for the repair of an agreed-on defect:

  • The seller puts the buyer in control of the repair, permitting the buyer to have confidence that the work was done to their satisfaction, with no short-cuts.
  • The buyer may be able to combine the needed repair with other elective repairs or property improvements (such as installing a larger ampacity electrical panel than the old one that was removed), thus saving money.
  • This step also relieves the seller of responsibility for the work having been performed correctly.

  It is important that any buyer be accurately informed lest the seller leave them with an unrecognized hazard in the building. In at least some states in the U.S. a seller or real estate agent who does not disclose a known, substantive property defect to a buyer could be liable for charges of fraud.

  The cost of a new electrical panel is such a small portion of the value of a building that the need to replace the panel is not a reason to refuse to buy the building just as the need to repair automobile brakes is not, alone, a reason to refuse to buy a used car.
  

Questions & Answers regarding this article

Questions & answers about the credibility of FPE Stab-Lok panel hazards and the need for complete panel replacement, the absence of warranty claims and replacement cost assistance, the absence of a government recall and other FPE risk assessment confusion..

Share this Article      

...

Technical Reviewers & References

• InspectAPedia.com^® - Daniel Friedman - Publisher & Editor.
• Critique, contributions wanted: Contact Us to suggest corrections or additions to articles at this website, and if you wish, to receive online listing and credit as a contributor. Particular thanks are due to the many experts and also consumers who read and critique technical articles at InspectAPedia.com.

Use links just below or at the left of each page to navigate this document or to view other topics at this website. Green links show where you are in our document or website.

FPE Stab-Lok HAZARDS & REPAIRS WEBSITE

• Thanks to reader Daniel Smead for helpful detailed editing May 2010
• Ampacity of an Electrical Service: How to determine the electrical service size or ampacity entering a building
• Circuit Breaker, a bad one fails to trip failure at aluminum bus-to-circuit breaker connection - field report and photographs
• Electrical System & Wiring Hazard Inspection, Detection, Cause, Remedy, Prevention - Main Electrical Page
• Electrical Panels, How to Inspect in buildings, safety for electrical inspectors, electrical panel, fusing, wiring defects, defective products. Inspection Class Presentation
• The Federal Pacific Stab-Lok Electric Panel Hazard Website Safety Information for Consumers.
• 2007 FPE Stab-Lok TECHNICAL REPORT - an updated test report of independent testing (a large 1.2MB PDF file) using a larger pool of FPE Stab-Lok circuit breakers than the older CPSC and Wright Malta tests found significantly higher failure rates of FPE Stab-Lok circuit breakers, including a look at critical safety failures (breaker failed to trip at 200% of rated current or jammed) which found up to 80% failure rate for FPE Stab-Lok GFCI circuit breakers (n=4), 12% failure rate for double pole FPE Stab-Lok circuit breakers (n=120), and a 1% failure rate for FPE Stab-Lok single pole circuit breakers (n=345).
• FPE FIRES: Failures continue: FPE breaker fails, results in fires: field reports
• Federal Pacific Electric Fires Waiting to Happen, Debate Waiting to Be Ended, detailed article
• Home Inspection Reporting Language and discussion for FPE panels
• Home Inspection Reporting Language and discussion for FPE panels
• How to Identify FPE Federal Pacific Stab-Lok Electric Panels - is yours one of these? ALSO: A History of the FPE Stab-Lok Issue.
• Federal Pacific Electric Panels: Fires Waiting to Happen, Debate Waiting to Be Ended
• How to Identify Federal Pacific Electric Panels Stab Lok Breakers & History of the Federal Pacific Electric Stab Lok Hazard
• Replacement Circuit Breakers for FPE Stab-Lok Electric Panels? are not recommended
• Replacement Panels for FPE Stab-Lok load centers - options include conventional complete panel replacement and a less costly replacement of the panel interior load center/bus assembly
• Schneider Canada Federal Pioneer circuit breaker recall
• 1983 CPSC Investigation of FPE Circuit Breakers Safety Information for Consumers
• 1982 Reliance Electric Co. SEC Quarterly Report: Note C. reports litigation between Reliance and UV Liquidating Trust and contends that "... improper and deceptive practices were employed for many years to secure UL listings for Federal Pacific's circuit protective products..."
• 1980 Reliance Electric Co. Press Release: improper practices used to obtain UL Listing for most of FPE's circuit breakers and notes testing which indicates "possible defects." 1980, Reliance Electric Co.
• 1980 FPE - Exxon Buys A Scandal Along With A Company improper practices used to obtain UL Listing for most of FPE's circuit breakers and notes testing which indicates "possible defects." 1980, Reliance Electric Co.
  
• ...

Books & Articles on Building & Environmental Inspection, Testing, Diagnosis, & Repair

• Our recommended books about building & mechanical systems design, inspection, problem diagnosis, and repair, and about indoor environment and IAQ testing, diagnosis, and cleanup are at the InspectAPedia Bookstore. Also see our Book Reviews - InspectAPedia.

• ...