Mold Test Procedures - are airborne mold spore counts per cubic meter if air valid?
Causes of variation in indoor air mold tests and airborne particle counts
Degree of variation in the level of indoor air particles over short time intervals
InspectAPedia offers impartial, unbiased advice without conflicts of interest.
We will block advertisements which we discover or readers inform us are associated with bad business practices,
false-advertising, or junk science. Our contact info is at
InspectAPedia.com/Contact.htm.
This document discusses a serious question about the currently-popular "spore counts" obtained by industrial hygienists,
home inspectors, and "mold investigators" (and the mold testing laboratories they use).
Airborne or other mold counts are used to estimate the toxic or allergenic mold exposure level of building occupants
in buildings where mold may be present.
Accuracy & Validity of Indoor Fungal Spore Counts & Cultures
First, should we be testing for mold at all? If you see mold on indoor surfaces, NO mold testing is needed to confirm that mold is present in a this building and that cleanup is needed. But if a large remediation project is planned, tests may be needed for project control - see When to identify mold?. See MOLD EXPERT, WHEN TO HIRE for a discussion of when it is or is not appropriate, justified, and ethical to hire a mold consultant to inspect, diagnose, and advise about mold contamination in a building.
Counting indoor mold spore levels per cubic meter of air or "liter"
produces numbers which may be very precise (many digits or decimal places) but which are generally highly inaccurate (wrong by
one to three orders of magnitude). Enormous variations in the level
of airborne particles in buildings occur from even the simplest changes such as walking through a room or turning on a furnace blower.
While many laboratories, including our own, participate in programs to calibrate and standardize their in-laboratory particle
counting, slide preparation, and microscopy procedures, no amount of precision in lab counting can overcome the several orders of
magnitude in variation of indoor particle levels that actually occurs in a building over intervals as short as a few seconds and as long
as days or months.
While there is a useful place for every environmental investigation tool, inadequacies in field procedure,
field condition reporting, and visual inspection that would permit an interpretation of lab results limit the usefulness of
"bare lab reports" which simply give a number. The number may be impressively precise, but highly inaccurate.
Spore Counts Obtained by Airborne Mold Spore Traps are of Questionable Accuracy
Warning: interpret all quantitative data, particularly counts of particles
in indoor air, with great caution. Individual samples of particles in air show
tremendous variation from minute to minute, making "ok" test results
a thing to view with skepticism.
Examples of factors which can cause an exponential
difference in particle levels in indoor residential air over short time
intervals include: mechanical disturbance (walking across a carpet or moving a
moldy cardboard box), operation of hot air heating system or central air
conditioning system, operation of other building fans, particularly ceiling
fans and vacuum cleaners, turning lights on and off, and opening or closing
windows and doors. In situations of particular risk, additional or periodic
testing should be considered.
Indoor counts vs. outdoor counts
The University of Minnesota fungal
experts observe that an outdoor-baseline comparison to indoor air is not valid
when the outdoor sample was taken during or immediately after precipitation
(spore counts plummet outdoors in the rain and might soar right after it), and
the comparison is probably not valid in winter when outdoor counts tend to be
below indoors. We agree and add other constraints: snow cover practically
eliminates spores from outdoor air. Even in warm weather spore counts vary during
the day as weather conditions (humidity, temperature, period
after rainfall) affect sporulation and spore movement.
Air sampling by culture plate or surface testing by swab are questionable
Similarly, tests which rely on culture to identify particles are at severe
risk of giving a "false negative" result, missing a serious problem,
or of giving a "misleading positive" result by asserting that a
particular spore which grew on the culture is the problem in the building.
Fungal spores grow at different rates on different culture media.
Spore
"A" may "overgrow" spore "B" in a particular
test, obscuring the presence of spore "B" which might be the real
problem in the building. Some fungal spores won't grow at all in culture media
(non-viable spores and many Ascospores) but may still be present at toxic
levels in a building.
More about mold testing and the validity of air sampling and home test kits for mold:
Swab sampling - what works or does not work about swab sampling for mold
As a collector of studies, papers, books on this topic, and as someone
conducting our own studies, we have seen a very wide range of opinion among
experts in the field. Spore allergenicity or toxicity varies widely among
fungal genera/species. So does the sensitivity of humans and other animals to
fungal spores.
So no single number will be absolutely correct. Just as spore
toxicity varies by species, so does the physical size of individual spores. The
effect of breathing air contaminated by 5000 Penicillium sp. spores per
cubic meter is unlikely to be identical to the effect of breathing 5000 Stachybotrys
chartarum spores per cubic meter of air.
Not only does their chemistry and
toxicity vary, but a typical Pen/Asp spore is about 2 microns in
diameter (1/25th the width of a typical human hair) while a typical Stachybotrys
chartarum spore might be 8 x 12 microns -- much larger and thus providing
more potentially harmful material per individual spore.
You can see that
writing federal or state standards for permissible fungal spore exposure by
"count" or "levels" is difficult. Not only are there many
variables to consider, but using currently popular air sampling or culture
methods, even a low or "OK" test result cannot guarantee that there
is no problem in the building.
Fortunately one can become reasonably confident
about the level of mold or allergen risk in a building through competent visual
inspection, judicious use of various sampling tools and methods, and competent
laboratory determination work. Because this expertise is
costly and the work time consuming, it should not be ordered without reasonable
justification.
Critique, contributions wanted: Contact Us to suggest corrections or additions to articles at this website, and if you wish, to receive online listing and credit as a contributor. Particular thanks are due to the many experts and also consumers who read and critique technical articles at InspectAPedia.com.
Additional technical contributors & reference sources for this article are listed below.
Use links just below or at the left of each page to navigate this document or to view other topics at this website. Green links show where you are in our document or website.
Books & Articles on Building & Environmental Inspection, Testing, Diagnosis, & Repair
Our recommended books about building & mechanical systems design, inspection, problem diagnosis, and repair, and about indoor environment and IAQ testing, diagnosis, and cleanup are at the InspectAPedia Bookstore. Also see our Book Reviews - InspectAPedia.
Kansas State University, department of plant pathology, extension plant pathology web page on wheat rust fungus: see http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/path-ext/factSheets/Wheat/Wheat%20Leaf%20Rust.asp
"A Brief Guide to Mold, Moisture, and Your Home",
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency US EPA - includes basic advice for building owners, occupants, and mold cleanup operations. See http://www.epa.gov/mold/moldguide.htm
Associations: Sick House, Sick Building, SBS - Air Quality, Government, Private Associations and Information Resources
Atlas of Clinical Fungi, 2nd Ed., GS deHoog, J Guarro, J Gene, & MJ Figueras, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, 2000, ISBN 90-70351-43-9 (you can buy this book at Amazon)
Atlas of Indoor Mold, Online Clinical Mold Atlas, Toxins, Pathogens, Allergens and Other Indoor Particles - Medical Health Effects of Mold (separate online document)
Black Mold that is Harmless Photos of recognizable, usually harmless black mold on wood, bluestain, ceratocystis, ophistoma
Building Floods: quick steps after a building flood or plumbing leak can prevent costly mold contamination
Classes of Mold: what types of cosmetic, allergenic, or toxic mold are a problem? Can mold be cleaned-up successfully?
"A Brief Guide to Mold, Moisture, and Your Home", U.S. Environmental Protection Agency US EPA - includes basic advice for building owners, occupants, and mold cleanup operations. See http://www.epa.gov/mold/moldguide.htm
"Disease Prevention Program for Certain Vegetable Crops," David B. Langston, Jr., Extension Plant Pathologist - Vegetables, University of Georgia (PDF document) original source: www.reeis.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/209797.html
"Disease Prevention in Home Vegetable Gardens,"
Patricia Donald,
Department of Plant Microbiology and Pathology,
Lewis Jett
Department of Horticulture, University of Missouri Extension - extension.missouri.edu/publications/DisplayPub.aspx?P=G6202
Fifth Kingdom, Bryce Kendrick, ISBN13: 9781585100224, is available from the InspectAPedia online bookstore - we recommend the CD-ROM version of this book. This 3rd/edition is a compact but comprehensive encyclopedia of all things mycological. Every aspect of the fungi, from aflatoxin to zppspores, with an accessible blend of verve and wit. The 24 chapters are filled with up-to-date information of classification, yeast, lichens, spore dispersal, allergies, ecology, genetics, plant pathology, predatory fungi, biological control, mutualistic symbioses with animals and plants, fungi as food, food spoilage and mycotoxins.
OTHER IAQ ISSUES: How To Find and Address Other Indoor Air or Indoor Environment Contaminants Besides Mold
Mold or allergens may not be the only or even the main indoor environmental contaminant. Don't let media attention to mold
cause so much enviro-scare fear that other, possibly more urgent hazards go un-addressed.
Ozone Warnings - Use of Ozone as a "mold"
remedy is ineffective and may be dangerous.
Pet control - if you can't say goodbye to your bird, cat, dog, guinea pig, hamster, tropical fish, then limit the
areas they occupy and limit the airflow from that area to sleeping or other areas of the building, use allergenic
bedding, eliminate wall-to-wall carpeting, improve housecleaning including use of a HEPA-rated vacuum cleaner. For more details
see our article Dog, Cat, and Other Animal Dander - Information for Asthmatics and Indoor Air Quality
Rodents, Mice, Squirrel Control - I find high levels of mouse and rodent dander, fecal dust, and urine-contaminated dust in some buildings,
and high levels of these materials in building insulation in those locations. If you have a mouse problem, particularly if mice and their waste (fecals or urine) are contaminating
the building HVAC or building insulation, may need both steps to clean up or remove infected materials and steps to stop an ongoing
rodent problem. If squirrels are a problem, the cleanup needs to include closing off entry openings into the building. Get some
help from a licensed pest control expert.