Standards for Inspecting Foundations for Defects InspectAPedia® -
Visual inspection of foundations
Foundation inspection standards, ASHI and other associations
Our site offers impartial, unbiased advice without conflicts of interest.
We will block advertisements which we discover or readers inform us are associated with bad business practices,
false-advertising, or junk science. Our contact info is at
InspectAPedia.com/appointment.htm.
More Information on Building Diagnostic Inspections and Repairs
The photo above shows a bowed masonry block foundation wall with horizontal cracking that occurred due to earth loading at the time
of construction, probably by vehicles driving too close to the foundation wall shortly after it was constructed. At this website
we explain how it is sometimes possible to be confident about the cause of foundation damage which in turn helps assess
the risk presented to the building.
Photographs of types of foundation cracks and other foundation damage: we have a large library of photographs which
we're in process of adding these photographs to this website. Pending completion of that work, contact the author if assistance is required.
FOUNDATION INSPECTION STANDARDS - Foundation Inspection Standards - ASHI Standards of Practice (American Society of Home Inspectors)
The following example of foundation inspection standards is quoted or paraphrased from the ASHI standards. Other home inspection
associations such as NAHI, CREIA, CAHI (in Canada), FABI, TAREI, CHI, and their brothers have (or should have) a similar standard
for inspecting and reporting on the condition of a building foundation. Those U.S. states or and Canada where home inspectors are licensed
also have published their own version (or have based theirs on preexisting versions of) these standards as well. Since the ASHI standards
are the oldest and have undergone considerable study and periodic updating, we refer to them here. For the latest version of
ASHI's home inspection standards and code of ethics, visit the ASHI website at www.ashi.org.
4.1.A.1. The inspector shall ... observe foundation
4.2.A.1. ... describe the type of foundation
4.2.E. ... report signs of water penetration/harmful condensation
Notice that in some Standards there was no mention of observations of damage or unsafe conditions!
This inconsistency in ASHI Standards reflects debate, fear, risk
Due Diligence: Clients expect inspection to identify concerns & defects
Engineering and Code Standards: pertain mostly to new construction; engineering analysis of
foundation defects and design of repairs is beyond the scope of a professional home inspection and
inspector; a home inspector who happens to be qualified to perform such services is not prohibited
from doing so on making appropriate arrangements with a client.
But notwithstanding Section 4.1 above, the following section requires the inspector to observe and report evidence of significant damage, including to visible portions of the foundation. Significant in this case means in need of immediate major repair; it might also mean in need of further evaluation by a qualified expert.
2.2 inspectors shall ... 2.2.b.3. ... state ... any ... components
... in need of immediate major repair
2.3 These Standards are not intended to limit inspectors from
2.3.A. reporting observations and conditions in addition ...
Use links just below or at the left of each page to navigate this document or to view other topics at this website. Green links show where you are in our document or website.
FOUNDATION DAMAGE SEVERITY TERMS - How to Characterize the Severity of Foundation Damage
Based on multiple national ASHI seminar polls conducted by the author - American Society of Home Inspectors (ASHI)
Minor, single, isolated, cosmetic, marketing concerns
Cracks, hairline to 1/16" horizontal
Cracks, hairline to 1/8" vertical and step; [1/4" ? per Alk - note that this is an unsubstantiated opinion]]
Cracks in slabs, hairline to 1/8", not extending into foundation
Use links just below or at the left of each page to navigate this document or to view other topics at this website. Green links show where you are in our document or website.
Modest foundation damage, monitoring appropriate
Horizontal bulge < 1.5", no signs of other significant damage
Leaning wall < 1/3 of wall thickness, from wall base (In author's opinion 1/3 is way too much movement to tolerate; a conventional thickness masonry block wall that leans in one inch over an 8' ht. (or maybe 1.5" per some surveys) might be monitored depending on other site conditions, history, etc. Walls buckled in or leaning more than 1" (or 1.5" in some jurisdictions) should be professionally evaluated further and may require near-term or even immediate repair; Walls buckled in or leaning an inch or less should be monitored.
If the cracks are old, with no sign of continuing/recurrent movement - the inspector is more likely to accept monitoring rather than requiring repair.
Cracks described by "wavy mortar" which were caused by damage during backfill while mortar was still "green" or soft (un-cured) and which are not accompanied by other signs of ongoing or additional movement, can be attributed to a single-event and may not require repair (depending on total amount of wall dislocation).
Significant, expert foundation assessment needed. Foundation repair may be needed
>1.5" horizontal bulge/lean or lateral dislocation >1/4".
Signs of active, recent, recurrent movement (may be seasonal or ongoing)
Sudden appearance of cracks, particularly in areas known to have sink-holes (e.g. some areas of the U.S. such as in Florida.) requires immediate assessment.
Signs of repeated repairs to foundation or interior
Cracks 1/4" [ 3/8" per Alk] & larger
Investigate any finding of which the inspector is uncertain or inexperienced.
WARNING: Don't make conclusions just based on crack size and location. The inspector must consider other site factors conditions,
history, materials, external forces, etc. Sudden catastrophes CAN occur, especially where site drainage or other conditions risk
undermining or sudden forces on the foundation.
Critique, contributions wanted: Contact Us to suggest corrections or additions to articles at this website, and if you wish, to receive online listing and credit as a contributor. Particular thanks are due to the many experts and also consumers who read and critique technical articles at InspectAPedia.com.
Additional technical contributors & reference sources for this article are listed below.
Use links just below or at the left of each page to navigate this document or to view other topics at this website. Green links show where you are in our document or website.
"Concrete Slab Finishes and the Use of the F-number System", Matthew Stuart, P.E., S.E., F.ASCE, online course at www.pdhonline.org/courses/s130/s130.htm
Sal Alfano - Editor, Journal of Light Construction*
Thanks to Alan Carson, Carson Dunlop, Associates, Toronto, for technical critique and some of the foundation inspection photographs cited in these articles
More Information on Building Diagnostic Inspections and Repairs
...
InspectAPedia® Home & Site Map - Building & Environmental Inspection, Testing, Diagnosis, Repair, & Problem Prevention Advice: In-depth research & advice on diagnosing, testing, correcting, & preventing building defects & indoor environmental hazards. Unbiased information, no conflicts of interest.
The Mold Information Center: What to Do About Mold in Buildings, When and How to Inspect for Mold, Clean Up Mold, or Avoid Mold Problems
Environmental Inspection, Testing, & Diagnosis On-Site IAQ, Gas, Air Testing, Mold Investigation, Sick Building Diagnosis, Lab Services, & Remediation Plan Preparation - indoor air quality testing, problem source determination, supporting lab work, written remediation plan addressing removal of environmental and other hazards and prevention of their recurrence.